WikiLeaks Crackers

Faramir faramir.cl at gmail.com
Fri Apr 9 05:50:39 CEST 2010


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

David Shaw escribió:
> On Apr 7, 2010, at 3:18 AM, Andre Amorim wrote:
> 
>> What type of encryption the WikiLeaks said to have broken? AES ?
...
> I do not think that this is a break of any serious crypto, though.  If someone could arrange for AES or any other strong cipher to be broken simply by asking for it on a web site, this would be news.

  Right, I was interested on the subject too, and wondering what kind of
encryption could have been used to encrypt the file. I guess David is
right and the key chosen was too weak... but it would be nice to hear
about what was actually the method used to encrypt and how did they
break it.

  Best Regards
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJLvqQPAAoJEMV4f6PvczxAjOAH/jDp7ulZBawjbVdQRh8whCCi
127y4D6OD4Y2ED0CQqw6Jw9jM39SjsbHoVc9V7AYhYbyCzMY/5KuQ+FoqA9oSo3m
j85clajh9clIluABEJHAWHjn0uTCPwMQ8Xv7AgpUvvZh73ImIP9VWPIt1lDWe9Cw
5qqPc2LtQIDCa9mBogKyqbArta4UuSax0ihmA9g758aUz/aZ6/uqHhXx0O1vOQZp
Tv+8jRQHN9emYoGwF3scFsb904PnfO/YU1rWF9kaMfgHpQ9MOjNM7iIom7iBOv4h
sV1An581e2CcPGVQq8yPTGz2pXRsWkmcNQYQqpvHwxAgFQ9Sa4UBotceFojZw2w=
=KU4+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list