Confused about Sub keys.

[Simon Dwyer]

Yes i made a bit of a mess when first setting up my account.  The two
revoked keys are ones i got confused with and wanted to start from
scratch.  The one that isnt revoked is my good key that i am using now.

9DA5B32F is my key that i will be using from now on.

Thanks for the reply guys,

Simon Dwyer

On Tue, 2008-06-10 at 05:01 -0400, Charly Avital wrote:
> Faramir wrote the following on 6/10/08 12:17 AM:
> [...]
> 
> > And that is the
> > reason to use "key pairs", because a singe key can't do both functions.
> 
> The above statement is not accurate.
> 
> A careful reading of <http://www.gnupg.org/gph/en/manual.html#INTRO> is
> recommended.
> 
> This is the Spanish version: <http://www.gnupg.org/gph/es/manual.html>
> 
> Attention Simon Dwyer. The following keys were found on a key server:
> (1)	Simon Luke Dwyer <sdwyer at spykes.id.au>
> 	Simon Luke Dwyer (Technology Services Group) <sdwyer at federalit.net>
> 	  1024 bit DSA key 9DA5B32F, created: 2008-06-09
> (2)	Simon Dwyer (SpYkEs) <sdwyer at spykes.id.au>
> 	  1024 bit DSA key 9D826360, created: 2008-06-09 (revoked)
> (3)	Simon Luke Dwyer (SpYkEs) <sdwyer at spykes.id.au>
> 	  1024 bit DSA key 41494BDE, created: 2008-06-06 (revoked)
> Can you please confirm that key No. 1 '1024 bit DSA key 9DA5B32F,
> created: 2008-06-09' is the one you are or will be using, since the
> other two have been revoked. Thanks in advance.
> 
> Charly
> 
> 
> 
> [...]
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gnupg-users mailing list
> Gnupg-users at gnupg.org
> http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20080611/2e7ddb29/attachment.pgp>