Naming of GnuPG

Chris Walters cwal989 at comcast.net
Fri Apr 25 21:46:50 CEST 2008


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

David Shaw wrote:
| Do people find the 1.4.x / 2.0.x thing confusing?

I can only speak for myself.  I don't find the 1.4.x / 2.0.x version numbering
thing confusing at all.  They each serve a different purpose and a different
audience.  I note that, currently, 1.4.x needs to be patched to compile in
support for IDEA, while 2.0.x has it, and a lot of other capabilities already
there.

I have compiled both on both GNU/Linux and Win32, and found that, as long as I
have the appropriate libraries, they both will compile and work correctly.  Of
course, I am a programmer, so I am used to separate versions of the same program.

Regards,
Chris

PS:  Sorry David, I hit the wrong button and forgot to check who I was sending
this message to.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJIEjUkAAoJEE8J0h3nbis2eg4P/2ovKaUecM856KlyqY0kDKSe
R03oVKjVOvi1i/e9j7JY0Ql2fJ84iWD1Z4Hxt7Yie7Orjse67XEkKI1E4B5JUraD
zScM/x2UpqdF6yt7NvYN4WNSNAU6/EHIyPQBFRdyYepI/NI6U/lARUaSFjikBX67
uqtXneqoV6mikLwsb3clAmRphpHGtYYmAcSJxVccuQZCz9RsoLpBfAvkGoLHc2sV
Q9vwPX7cCtUcmC/XeZGWQdcXWM9cZKrKblVOrNSdq7UqtqcThYYAN1WFPPZCg5VV
8HQML02dNKT7PAS29vtKYFOqs4D5bGvQfvfkAdUA9nuHZjWuj//x4K516WLaj3dh
YxMgE2bKOHI+31yf1R6CSpE1Cgy84eZSAeZRMWOwdetRA9ElrUTWvOc3q+vAxEec
3Mny7ahw0B63cQjs9LGviFvxqVGHAzxaW9hj1zGpNy4npkWuNwvewZlXybcPAyQw
w6CHnGyTGshwRyJKQU0SHTvOm1jwjgV6Qx4aYL8AUneD/VwcIf4UWppmVKU+fTk6
P7QztZkZFJf+e0Oo/Yl5g4iZehhfBcKZwlAyMubTDeG/sgCRDP10jTthakERbnZr
+2BgXIz+ElT84KYKl4GIxR2+16q8vj7HB/LSHsxDur83MPP4mGcJCajnolm0zc/0
M7EiWOc4IJaasFNVBH5P
=fY17
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list