Naming of GnuPG

[John W. Moore III]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:

> It would be better to consider to slowly phase out the 1.4x branch.

I disagree!  I much prefer using the 1.4.x Branch in static format
because it is faster, smaller and not dependent upon accessing so many
independent libraries.  Additionally, I have no use for the S/MIME
capabilities contained within the 2.0.x Trunk.

IMHO, the labels 'Branch' & Trunk' should be sufficient to designate
between the 2 versions.

JOHN ;)
Timestamp: Monday 21 Apr 2008, 16:04  --400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.5.0-svn4748: (MingW32)
Comment: Public Key at:  http://tinyurl.com/8cpho
Comment: Gossamer Spider Web of Trust: https://www.gswot.org
Comment: Homepage:  http://tinyurl.com/yzhbhx

iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJIDPNcAAoJEBCGy9eAtCsP7ZgIAKCJj3Y6WFHShvMxO0HcyOOC
03c9GQ3vbdxf3i/f3lcQwjX6bbLr6/ARNzrudInbWHjVMCCsaNrCxZvdhrGoLlE3
C5JpAJvHwctTUaBViPcCwHEP0gM2uNjw2BCPzDDF+JQqiSRQ8NkTfZw7p9Oup1QP
h/538om8n0IMlG+GIa1XuhMqYoZvoe1hVGSmbzral44n9EjuICn9iBFQT9D6yDnJ
QxTA0h32Pd2KGWfNW58E90rAxwI2noyDkSJ9ayhvPq9OP8v0+IxOYEqb6Qkyvj/2
dt+e6GNhkDiRK1ZStYWilWdpqpiGRBaEEzhqAB+du7Hjscin33iVlF0uRQyDl4o=
=q7aV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----