Logo ballot reminder

[Wouter van Heyst]

On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 01:21:20PM -0500, Andrew Myers wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> CIVS originally sent text/plain emails. But it was useful to be able to 
> embed links and to preserve election description formatting. The HTML it 
> sends is pretty minimal -- I don't think it should set off reasonable 
> spam filters. 

It certainly was enough to make my brain register it as unreadable, I
only went back to it when Warner mentioned the deadline again.
Looking at it now I agree it is rather minimal as far as html goes, but
it's still not something I'd willingly read as email (had to spawn a
browser to look at it).

> At least, I haven't heard this complaint before. Making 
> HTML mail an option seems like a good idea, though there are already too 
> many options for my taste. If someone wants to write that patch I'd be 
> happy to include it.

I had a look at the code, but unfortunately I'm not much of a perl
coder. I'm sure there others on this list who can do a better job than
I can.

> I hope the election system has been working well for everyone otherwise.

The system was fairly easy to use, the hardest part was deciding how the
various entries ranked :)

Wouter van Heyst
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 307 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : /pipermail/attachments/20061201/c4a537b9/attachment.pgp