Corrupt keys

[Neil Williams]

On Tuesday 21 June 2005 9:48 am, Alphax wrote:
> Fortunately, I have a "clean" copy of this key

as does subkeys.pgp.net - it was retrieved automatically and without spurious 
signatures or errors.

> - it  
> has about 3 sigs on it,

gpg --list-sigs 0xF874C613
pub   1024D/F874C613 2005-04-28
uid                  Alphax <alphasigmax at gmail.com>
sig          97394664 2005-05-23  [User ID not found]
sig 3        F874C613 2005-04-29  Alphax <alphasigmax at gmail.com>
sig 1   P    C521097E 2005-05-05  [User ID not found]
sig 1   P    9C851DF1 2005-05-05  [User ID not found]
uid                  Andrew Cranwell (Alphax) <alphasigmax at gmail.com>
sig          97394664 2005-05-23  [User ID not found]
sig 3        F874C613 2005-04-28  Alphax <alphasigmax at gmail.com>
sig 1   P    C521097E 2005-05-05  [User ID not found]
uid                  Andrew Cranwell <a1118812 at student.adelaide.edu.au>
sig          97394664 2005-05-23  [User ID not found]
sig 3        F874C613 2005-04-29  Alphax <alphasigmax at gmail.com>
sig 1   P    C521097E 2005-05-05  [User ID not found]
sub   2048g/51E09049 2005-04-28
sig          F874C613 2005-04-28  Alphax <alphasigmax at gmail.com>


> as opposed to the current 500+.

Delete the key from your keyring, retrieve it from subkeys.pgp.net and change 
your keyserver preference.

> Actually, I'd be 
> interested to hear who has a non-corrupt copy of this key, and how many
> sigs are on it (please make public, so we can all share it!).
>
> Oh, and why does this list not automagically set the Reply-to header?

Because it's sensible and uses decent headers like List-Id.
:-)

-- 

Neil Williams
=============
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : /pipermail/attachments/20050621/add84d0b/attachment.pgp