GPG 1.4.0 vs. 1.4.0a
DBSMITH at OhioHealth.com
DBSMITH at OhioHealth.com
Mon Jan 24 23:49:23 CET 2005
ok but what I really wanted was when I do an upgrade, is that all I have to
do is replace the binary on a UNIX system for gpg?
Derek B. Smith
OhioHealth IT
UNIX / TSM / EDM Teams
John Clizbe
<JPClizbe at comcast
.net> To
Sent by:
gnupg-users-bounc cc
es at gnupg.org GnuPG users <gnupg-users at gnupg.org>
Subject
Re: GPG 1.4.0 vs. 1.4.0a
01/24/2005 05:34
PM
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
DBSMITH at OhioHealth.com wrote:
> does this apply to UNIX systems as well?
1.4.0a addressed a windows-Only problem.
- --
John P. Clizbe Inet: JPClizbe(a)comcast DOT nyet
Golden Bear Networks PGP/GPG KeyID: 0x608D2A10
"Be who you are and say what you feel because those who mind don't matter
and those who matter don't mind." - Dr Seuss, "Oh the Places You'll Go"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1-cvs-2005-01-21 (Windows 2000 Pro SP4)
Comment: When cryptography is outlawed, b25seSBvdXRsYXdzIHdpbGwgdXNlIG
Comment: Annoy John Asscraft -- Use Strong Encryption.
Comment: It's YOUR right - for the time being.
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFB9XgHHQSsSmCNKhARAsIYAKC91VdUwFuUCmqUEse9iCtD4Y5J9gCg0mub
RXrF3HFV2K+eaoR9f2aUGZg=
=xGJU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users at gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
More information about the Gnupg-users
mailing list