Key signing policies (was: key-signing for pseudonyms)

Atom 'Smasher' atom at suspicious.org
Wed May 19 05:46:26 CEST 2004


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, 19 May 2004, Marcus Frings wrote:
> <http://www.sc-delphin-eschweiler.de/pgp/>
>
> Maybe someone of you would like to have a look at it and tell me what
> could be improved.
>
> One thing will be added in the next few days: I won't sign keys that
> consist of a pseudonym only (and haven't done in the past).
============================

that's a great piece of work!

the only part that doesn't make sense to me is why a sign-only key can't
qualify for a level 3 signature, even if it meets all of the criteria for
a sign+encrypt key to get a level 3 signature...?


        ...atom

 _________________________________________
 PGP key - http://atom.smasher.org/pgp.txt
 762A 3B98 A3C3 96C9 C6B7 582A B88D 52E4 D9F5 7808
 -------------------------------------------------

	"Poor people have access to the courts in the same
	 sense that the Christians had access to the lions."
		-- Judge Earl Johnson, Jr.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)
Comment: What is this gibberish?  -  http://atom.smasher.org/links/#digital_signatures

iEYEARECAAYFAkCq2JYACgkQnCgLvz19QeP6ZwCgkmZ529QOlEmBfYIQKDXafjyW
qQEAnignhoMYXtFGVQhraUuZhVZ3WDWw
=WDnI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list