Key signing policies (was: key-signing for pseudonyms)
Atom 'Smasher'
atom at suspicious.org
Wed May 19 05:46:26 CEST 2004
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 19 May 2004, Marcus Frings wrote:
> <http://www.sc-delphin-eschweiler.de/pgp/>
>
> Maybe someone of you would like to have a look at it and tell me what
> could be improved.
>
> One thing will be added in the next few days: I won't sign keys that
> consist of a pseudonym only (and haven't done in the past).
============================
that's a great piece of work!
the only part that doesn't make sense to me is why a sign-only key can't
qualify for a level 3 signature, even if it meets all of the criteria for
a sign+encrypt key to get a level 3 signature...?
...atom
_________________________________________
PGP key - http://atom.smasher.org/pgp.txt
762A 3B98 A3C3 96C9 C6B7 582A B88D 52E4 D9F5 7808
-------------------------------------------------
"Poor people have access to the courts in the same
sense that the Christians had access to the lions."
-- Judge Earl Johnson, Jr.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)
Comment: What is this gibberish? - http://atom.smasher.org/links/#digital_signatures
iEYEARECAAYFAkCq2JYACgkQnCgLvz19QeP6ZwCgkmZ529QOlEmBfYIQKDXafjyW
qQEAnignhoMYXtFGVQhraUuZhVZ3WDWw
=WDnI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Gnupg-users
mailing list