[GnuPG] Re: Question about multiple secret keys
Werner Koch
wk at gnupg.org
Thu Aug 12 16:20:37 CEST 2004
On Thu, 12 Aug 2004 09:36:10 -0400, James P Howard, said:
> I am not. Further, setting --no-verbose has not improved the
> situation:
See:
if (opt.verbose)
log_info ( _("no secret subkey "
"for public subkey %08lX - ignoring\n"),
(ulong)keyid_from_pk (pk,NULL) );
2003-04-29 Werner Koch <wk at gnupg.org>
* sig-check.c (check_key_signature2): Made "no subkey for subkey
binding packet" a verbose item instead of a !quiet one. There are
too many garbled keys out in the wild.
* getkey.c (premerge_public_with_secret): Made "no secret subkey
for" warning a verbose item and translatable.
Thus I conclude your version is older than 1.2.2 - please update to
the latest one.
Werner
More information about the Gnupg-users
mailing list