pgp/mime vs in-line pgp

[Todd]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Stewart V. Wright wrote:
> It's not even that simple.  I'm on both this list (obviously) and
> the GnuCash lists.  What surprises me is that both use Mailman
> v2.1.4, I sign my messages the same way on both lists and yet my
> messages to the GnuCash list don't seem to be verified in an
> acceptable way (to Mutt).  The _signed_ part of the message is
> verified OK, it is just that the signed message plus footer returns
> a failed check.  Where as on this list everything works fine!

Perhaps you could give mutt 1.5.6 a try?  There was a change since
1.5.4 in the output when verifying signatures with a multipart/mixed
content-type.

I don't know why you get different results from two different lists
running the same version of Mailman without comparing the headers and
mime-parts from the two lists.

If mutt 1.5.6 doesn't change the results, I'll be more curious about
it.  I'd like to see mutt work as well as possibly in these case as
I'm on a lot of mailman lists as well.

- -- 
Todd        OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xD654075A | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp
======================================================================
Gradualism is perpetuity in practice.
    -- William Lloyd Garrison

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: When crypto is outlawed bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl.

iD8DBQFAfVdduv+09NZUB1oRAmR7AJ9QePPJwhRB2AVw6vr1Z/agTRVsBQCfZWMp
tPPEyP9F8cmXOuaGuKbIgj8=
=1+Yk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----