Why isn't this old and very trusted PGP key accepted by GPG?

[Ingo Klöcker]

On Monday 13 October 2003 21:02, Baby Peanut wrote:
> $ gpg --import Victor_A_Abell.pgp
> gpg: WARNING: using insecure memory!
> gpg: please see http://www.gnupg.org/faq.html for more
> information
> gpg: key 40BD3D55: no valid user IDs
> gpg: this may be caused by a missing self-signature
       ----------------------------------------------
> gpg: Total number processed: 1
> gpg:           w/o user IDs: 1
>
> Why isn't this old and very trusted PGP key accepted
> by GPG?

gpg told you why (see above).

Regards,
Ingo
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: signature
Url : /pipermail/attachments/20031013/8c63b62a/attachment.bin