Timing test of GnuPG and old PGP

Steve Butler sbutler at fchn.com
Tue Nov 11 13:09:04 CET 2003


All of the PGP recipients with whom we have dealt will accept other ciphers
than IDEA.  In most cases they were unaware that we were sending data with
one of the alternate ciphers.

PGP seems to honor the preferences set on our PK.  At least PGP vendors have
not had problems sending us encrypted data once we had the preferences set
correctly (on our key).

I think you can be "transparent" without using IDEA.

-----Original Message-----
From: Hunter, Bryan [mailto:Bryan_Hunter at archway.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 12:51 PM
To: gnupg-users at gnupg.org
Subject: RE: Timing test of GnuPG and old PGP


Thank you all for your help and interest.  The PGP was using IDEA and the
GnuPG was using Triple-DES.  Retesting with CAST5 yielded similar timings.

This brings up an interesting question (at least to me).  PGP carries the
symmetric cipher type with the public key.  Switching from PGP to GnuPG
while maintaining transparency to the recipient would seemingly require IDEA
for those who have specified it.  Being in the USA, this would presumably
require a license?  Are licenses available?

Please excuse the delay in reporting back on my original query.
Thanks,
Bryan Hunter

-----Original Message-----
From: Ryan Malayter [mailto:rmalayter at bai.org]
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 6:36 PM
To: Hunter, Bryan; gnupg-users at gnupg.org
Subject: RE: Timing test of GnuPG and old PGP


> From: Hunter, Bryan
> Subject: Timing test of GnuPG and old PGP

> A timing of a simple encryption of a large (327MB) file 
> showed that GnuPG
> took 2 1/2 times longer than an old PGP program.  Is this an expected
> typical result?

Maybe. What version was the "old" PGP? What symmetric cipher did you use
with each program? Perhaps GnuPG used Triple-DES, which is much slower
than the IDEA and CAST algorithms that were the default in older PGP
programs. You can change your kep preferences to use AES, CAST, or some
other speedy cipher with GnuPG.

I assume you eliminated the obvious possibilities for the slowness:
other system activity, file system fragmentation, etc.

Regards,
	Ryan


_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users at gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users at gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:  This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.




More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list