Change comments?
Neil Williams
linux at codehelp.co.uk
Mon Dec 15 18:44:21 CET 2003
On Monday 15 Dec 2003 6:20 pm, Malte Gell wrote:
> Am Montag, 15. Dezember 2003 15:40 schrieb David Shaw:
> > The comments are part of the user ID string, and are not changeable.
>
> Would it be a bad idea to change this? For instance I have a key solely
The comment is part of the identity of the user and changing the comment is
akin to changing the email or the name - those who had signed that UID would
have every right to be upset.
> to use with ICQ and its comment string contains the ICQ UIN. Should the
> UIN ever change I had to add a new dummy uid to create a new comment
Create a new UID with the new ICQ UIN if and when needed. Revoke the old UID
and, out of courtesy, request that each signatory refreshes their copy of
your key.
> string with the new UIN. IF the comment string could be edited this
> wouldn't be necessary. What do you think about making the comment
> string more flexible? Of course any change would be protected by the
> passphrase.
But any change would also destroy the worth of signatures on that UID - the
UID would be untrusted and all signatories would be obliged to re-validate
the changed UID. Far clearer to revoke the old one and add a new, then
everyone can see exactly what you've done and why.
--
Neil Williams
=============
http://www.codehelp.co.uk/
http://www.dclug.org.uk/
http://www.isbn.org.uk/
http://sourceforge.net/projects/isbnsearch/
http://www.biglumber.com/x/web?qs=0x8801094A28BCB3E3
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: signature
Url : /pipermail/attachments/20031215/2871c276/attachment.bin
More information about the Gnupg-users
mailing list