Re[4]: nonsubscriber posts
David T-G
davidtg-gnupg@justpickone.org
Tue May 14 13:35:01 2002
--xesSdrSSBC0PokLI
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lars --
=2E..and then Lars Hecking said...
%=20
% > If not, the mailing list software will still add some bits like
% >=20
% > Subject: non-member submission
% =20
% I am strictly against any subject-mangling, no matter for what reasons.
For mailing lists, I am, too. For mail that gets sent to the moderator
to await approval, such a Subject: is not inappropriate. The mutt-users
list, for instance, does this. To wit:
2100 N - May 14 own (152K) BOUNCE mutt-announce@mutt.org: Approval requir=
ed:
2101 N - May 14 Maj (0.1K) SUBSCRIBE mutt-announce devendra@cadence.com
2102 N - May 14 Maj (0.1K) SUBSCRIBE mutt-dev devendra@cadence.com
2103 N - May 14 Maj (0.1K) SUBSCRIBE mutt-users devendra@cadence.com
2104 N - May 14 own (2.8K) BOUNCE mutt-users@mutt.org: Non-member subm=
iss
2105 N - May 14 ced (2.9K) Re: bounce mutt-users@mutt.org: non-member =
sub
2106 N - May 14 MAI (42K) failure notice
2107 N - May 14 own (129K) BOUNCE mutt-users@mutt.org: Non-member subm=
iss
2108 N - May 14 own (18K) BOUNCE mutt-dev@mutt.org: Non-member submiss=
ion
2109 N - May 14 MAI (0.9K) failure notice
Now, this may not be the *best* way to handle moderator mail, but it
certainly is unrelated to the list mail itself.
HTH & HAND
:-D
--=20
David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles
(play) davidtg@justpickone.org * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie
(work) davidtgwork@justpickone.org
http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/ Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!
--xesSdrSSBC0PokLI
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE84PaiGb7uCXufRwARAlC9AJwLLBZd+8T2nsAQIZuUs9g2JeXrcQCdGf81
ZaHVMutMHb2+0qE8yoZYD2E=
=eJhu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--xesSdrSSBC0PokLI--