key-keyserver problem?

[Jason Harris]

--zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


(NB:  The thread starts here:
  http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2002-July/014141.html )

On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 10:08:43AM -0400, David Shaw wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 12:45:10AM -0400, Psy-Kosh wrote:
>=20
> > >This looks like the key (fetched from ldap://pgp.surfnet.nl:11370)
> > (but
> > >shouldn't GPG report the signature (on the signed list message) was
> > made
> > >by 71AD88B3 instead of reporting 401EDF13 - Psy-Kosh, did you sign
> > >the message with a standalone version of 401EDF13?):
> >=20
> > I'm using a signing subkey, so I guess it's just reporting the
> > specific subkey.
>=20
> Yes, that is what happens with signing subkeys.

OK.

> So it's a v4 RSA key and you have multiple subkeys.  The HKP
> keyservers are going to mangle the key, and then just to add insult to
> injury, report it under the wrong keyid (look under 4E553FDF). :(

Geez David, I _know_ you are aware of the fact that I've patched
keyserver.kjsl.com to calculate the keyids for v4 RSA keys correctly:

  http://lists.kjsl.com/pipermail/pgp-keyserver-folk/2002-June/000030.html

(unless that email was forged).  So please, be specific.

--=20
Jason Harris          | NIC:  JH329, PGP:  This _is_ PGP-signed, isn't it?
jharris@widomaker.com | web:  http://jharris.cjb.net/

--zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE9NGZ8SypIl9OdoOMRAn4ZAKCbR0HkT7RmK7kLbjC3UHTNgqDgOgCfVhuZ
2r3lLPQ3HjkAMsQlSnqqqoc=
=nX2F
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx--