PGP 7.0.5 and GPG
Ricardo SIGNES
samael-gnupg@lists.manxome.org
Thu Jul 4 20:44:02 2002
--82I3+IH0IqGh5yIs
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 04:53:34PM +0000, Brian M. Carlson wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 03:44:16PM -0400, Ricardo SIGNES wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 10:06:15AM -0500, Jeff Hall wrote:
> > >=20
> <crud snipped>
> >=20
> > What is that monstrosity?
>=20
> Try uudecoding it. You'll find that it's one of those horrible
> disclaimers. You can tell by the name. Although shouldn't it be 644? Or
> at the very worst 664? It's very inventive of them to uuencode it, don't
> you think?
I would imagine that, as there is no notice to explain how to read it, and =
it
isn't described as a MIME type or attachment, it would have little bearing =
in
court. Legal notices need to be marked and legible. Scribing them in Line=
ar-A
on the inside of screwholes isn't binding.
GAR!
--=20
rjbs
--82I3+IH0IqGh5yIs
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE9JJfR3bSmE+TdcacRAgoqAJ9E8YtdPC4RMoiyG+Ce2cw/XhDHfACfaRZR
oLyYmhpEYczOZ1RwldPCAUA=
=S/2q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--82I3+IH0IqGh5yIs--