(no subject)

[Ingo =?iso-8859-1?q?Kl=F6cker?=]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thursday 10 January 2002 13:54, Mica wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Jan 2002, at 17:06:04  +0800 Remote wrote:
>
>
> RMDS> Çë´ó¼ÒÔÚÊÕµ½ÊÖ»ú¶ÌÐÅÏ¢=
·¢À´µÄÈ·ÈÏÂëºó
> RMDS> Ò»¶¨Òª¾¡¿ìµ½²ÆÉñÍøÕ¾Êä=
ÈëÈ·ÈÏÂë
> RMDS> È·ÈÏÉí·Ý£¬ÕâÑù²ÅÄÜÕæÕý=
¼ÓÈë²ÆÉñÍø³ÉΪ»áÔ±,
> RMDS> ¶øÇÒÒ»¶¨ÒªÌîдÏêϸÕæʵ=
µÄÊÕ¿îµØÖ·,·ñÔòµ¼Ö»áÔ±
> RMDS> ÎÞ·¨ÊÕµ½"²ÆÉñÍøÕ¾"Ö§¸¶µ=
ÄÏÖ½ð»Ø±¨,Èç¹ûÄúÔÚ
> RMDS> ×¢²áʱҲûÓÐÌîдÏêϸÕæ=
ʵµÄ½ÖµÀµØÖ·£¬ÇëµÇ¼²ÆÉñÍøÕ¾µÄ»áÔ±Çø
> RMDS> ½øÐÐÐ޸ģ¬²ÆÉñÍøÕ¾¼´½«=
ÕýʽÔËÐС£
>
> RMDS> µãÕâÀï
>
> What I have to learn to read this?

Chinese. It's a gb2312-encoded spam message. Chinese spammers tend to 
forget the charset=gb2312 parameter of the Content-Type: header. They 
seem to assume that everybody uses gb2312 as standard encoding.

Regards,
Ingo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8Qd2FGnR+RTDgudgRAo2mAKCn1N1Qin9u+dkUJ3o4kaDG9zZVdQCgmGWJ
VeAR8o//sVUJhICHVFt6klQ=
=FkLQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----