GNUPG / PGP / Java / hushmail.com

[L. Sassaman]

Hrmm. This was because of the RSA patent. I thought the license was worded
such that it wouldn't matter now. I could be wrong.

What does the 2.3 license say?

On 18 Jan 2001, Florian Weimer wrote:

> "L. Sassaman" <rabbi@quickie.net> writes:
>
> > PGP prior to 5.x is free for whatever use.
>
> For PGP 2.6.3, the standard license from MIT covers only
> non-commercial use.  In addition, the PGP documentation clearly states
> that in order to use PGP commercially, you have to obtain a version
> from ViaCrypt.
>
> So in fact, the 2.6.x situation is quite similar to the post-2.6.x
> situation (modulo s/ViaCrypt/NAI/, of course).
>
> --
> Florian Weimer 	                  Florian.Weimer@RUS.Uni-Stuttgart.DE
> University of Stuttgart           http://cert.uni-stuttgart.de/
> RUS-CERT                          +49-711-685-5973/fax +49-711-685-5898
>
> --
> Archive is at http://lists.gnupg.org - Unsubscribe by sending mail
> with a subject of  "unsubscribe"  to gnupg-users-request@gnupg.org
>

__

L. Sassaman

Security Architect                  |  "The only cure for
Technology Consultant               |   sadness is learning"
                                    |
http://sion.quickie.net             |    --Thomas Jefferson








-- 
Archive is at http://lists.gnupg.org - Unsubscribe by sending mail
with a subject of  "unsubscribe"  to gnupg-users-request@gnupg.org