Newbie question: GnuPG and PGP
Werner Koch
wk@gnupg.org
Sat, 6 Jan 2001 16:19:49 +0100
On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, Jesus M. Salvo Jr. wrote:
> -----------------------------
> pub 1024D/51415191 2001-01-06 Jesus M. Salvo Jr. <jmsalvo@ihug.com.au>
> sig 51415191 2001-01-06 Jesus M. Salvo Jr. <jmsalvo@ihug.com.au>
> sub 1024g/8613FF52 2001-01-06 [expires: 2001-02-05]
> sig 51415191 2001-01-06 Jesus M. Salvo Jr. <jmsalvo@ihug.com.au>
>
>
> Can anyone tell me what that ( sub 1024g/8613FF52 means and why is it
> not the same as below? I did not create a key pair in GnuPG. All I did
> Type bits keyID Date User ID
> DSS 1024 0x51415191 2001/01/06 expires 2001/02/05
> DH 1024 0x51415191 2001/01/06 expires 2001/02/05
PGP is wrong. Every key including subkeys have a unique KeyID and
by default GnuPG _and_ PGP 5,6,7 do create a primary and one
secindary key - the first one is used for signing, the second one for
encrypting (PGP calls ElGamal keys (the "g" in GnuPG's listing) DH
(Diffie Hellman)) I don't know why PGP lists the primary keys ID
with the DH subkey.
Werner
--
Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org>
GNU Privacy Guard (http://www.gnupg.org)
Free Software Foundation Europe (http://www.fsfeurope.org)
[Please see X-* mail header for OpenPGP key info]
--
Archive is at http://lists.gnupg.org - Unsubscribe by sending mail
with a subject of "unsubscribe" to gnupg-users-request@gnupg.org