Mac OS X

[Mark Weaver]

frankly i don't see what all the fuss is about Zsh myself. and just what's
wrong the Bourne Shell?

-- 
daRcmaTTeR
 =/\=???
      |%C++

On Wed, 1 Aug 2001, Lars Hecking wrote:

> Nathan Heagy writes:
> > >  One reason for badly supported platforms is often that the developers
> > >  have no access to them. Worse if such platforms are sufficiently non-
> > >  standard, e.g. crap like zsh in place of The Bourne Shell.
> >
> > First, let's not start a shell holy war. Suffice to say noone with any
> > knowledge of shells would dismiss zsh as crap, especially in comparison to
> > the Bourne Shell.
>
>  Sorry if this was misunderstood. I meant to refer to the fact that a
>  non-compatible shell was chosen as /bin/sh. zsh is generally fine as
>  an interactive shell.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnupg-users mailing list
> Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
> http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
>