RSA / DSS (keylenghts)

Ralf Senderek ralf@senderek.de
Thu, 21 Sep 2000 16:52:06 +0100 (GMT)


On Thu, 21 Sep 2000, Simpson, Sam wrote:


> For a start: Elgamal keys are (currently thought to be...) stronger than
> RSA keys of the same size?
>
> (see for example: http://www.scramdisk.clara.net/pgpfaq.html#SubRSADH).
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Sam Simpson
> http://www.scramdisk.clara.net/
If you double the size of a RSA-modulus (i.e from 512 Bit to 1024 Bit) there is a huge amount of possible new secret key values (factor 2^512) BUT: if you double the size of a DSS-key not one additional secret key value is added because the amount of possible secret keys is limited by the size of the hash-function (160 bits), Only the mathematical operation will use a longer key (as modulus) and consequently takes more time. Ralf Senderek *.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.* * Ralf Senderek <ralf@senderek.de> * What is privacy * * http://senderek.de * without * * Tel.: 02432-3960 Sandstr. 60 D-41849 Wassenberg * PGP-2.6.3i? * *.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.* -- Archive is at http://lists.gnupg.org - Unsubscribe by sending mail with a subject of "unsubscribe" to gnupg-users-request@gnupg.org