open source

[L. Sassaman]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 24 Oct 2000, Wayne Davis wrote:

> The folks ate NAI/PGP have made the assertion that GPG has taken PGP and
> reverse engineered it in order to obtain the source fo GPG.
> Can you provide the GPG side of this story?

Can you provide a source for that claim? I find it highly unlikely that
anyone at NAI actually said that.


- --Len.

__

L. Sassaman

Security Architect             |  "The world's gone crazy, 
Technology Consultant          |   and it makes no sense..."
                               |
http://sion.quickie.net        |                   --Sting 


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: OpenPGP Encrypted Email Preferred.

iD8DBQE594EjPYrxsgmsCmoRAsa/AKCHmnHyF9Vn9G6bzvS+ldb/+a0SxQCg1JjM
cGSPUHiPhzZlI7ATPjamjyk=
=djzk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
Archive is at http://lists.gnupg.org - Unsubscribe by sending mail
with a subject of  "unsubscribe"  to gnupg-users-request@gnupg.org