AES for GnuPG, on Mon Oct 2?

[Mr. Bad]

>>>>> "WK" == Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org> writes:

    >> I didn't follow the AES debate lately, but is Twofish still in
    >> the race? If so, would that mean that the current code of
    >> Twofish needs to change, or 2 codes would be assigned for
    >> Twofish, or is the AES implementation different from the GnuPG
    >> implementation?

    WK> There is only one Twofish.

It's pretty much a moot point, since Rijndael is the new AES.

~Mr. Bad

-- 
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 /\____/\   Mr. Bad <mr.bad@pigdog.org>
 \      /   Pigdog Journal | http://pigdog.org/ | *Stay*Real*Bad*
 |  (X \x)   
 (    ((**) "If it's not bad, don't do it.
  \  <vvv>   If it's not crazy, don't say it."
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

-- 
Archive is at http://lists.gnupg.org - Unsubscribe by sending mail
with a subject of  "unsubscribe"  to gnupg-users-request@gnupg.org