Windoze PGP Compatability

L. Sassaman rabbi@quickie.net
Sun, 30 Apr 2000 18:20:06 -0700 (PDT)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sun, 30 Apr 2000, Werner Koch wrote:


> On Mon, 24 Apr 2000, L. Sassaman wrote:
>
> > Schneier's work, use Twofish if you must. Even CAST and 3DES are probably
> > better choices than Blowfish. I don't even think that Bruce recommends
> > people use Blowfish anymore.
>
> According to private mail with Bruce last year, he sometimes
> recommends Blowfish and sometimes Twofish with no real facts behind
> it. Okay times are changing and Twofish seems to be a good choice now
> - however we should do this together with the new MDC packet.
Isn't Twofish Symmetric Key Algorithm ID 10? I'm not seeing a direct correlation between the MDC packet and adding Twofish. But re: the MDC packet, last I heard Hal was working on getting that into 7.0 (this is from his posts to the OpenPGP list). __ L. Sassaman System Administrator | Technology Consultant | "To hold a pen is to be at war." icq.. 10735603 | pgp.. finger://ns.quickie.net/rabbi | --Voltaire -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: OpenPGP Encrypted Email Preferred. iD8DBQE5DNvOPYrxsgmsCmoRAqslAJ9bAcWqTDJ2WXeIj+N8T7NfwpZiSACg0q65 YKcm+R7Yw20Ks/HcBXvJ50w= =IZvA -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----