GnuPG: what email client should i use?

[Billy Donahue]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, 25 Jul 2000, Stefan Suurmeijer wrote:

> Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2000 18:37:00 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Stefan Suurmeijer <stefan@symbolica.nl>
> To: Lars Hecking <lhecking@nmrc.ie>
> Cc: gnupg-users@gnupg.org
> Subject: Re: GnuPG: what email client should i use?
> Resent-Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2000 18:39:35 +0200
> Resent-From: gnupg-users@gnupg.org
> 
> On Tue, 25 Jul 2000, Lars Hecking wrote:
> 
> > 
> > > has anybody got experiences with different email
> > > clients for X?
> > > 
> > > the trouble is that i found different clients
> > > supporting pgp but i can't make them work (even if
> > > i use gpgpgp) with gpg.
> > > 
> > > any suggestions?
> > 
> >  I generally stay away from GUI mail user agents. Of the text mode
> >  MUAs, mutt supports gpg out of the box. Pine can use gpg too, I think.
> > 
> > 
> 
> just get pgp4pine from linuxberg or directly from the homesite 
> (http://pgp4pine.flatline.de). It's easy to configure and works with both
> PGP and GPG. And pine is (in my humble opinion) still the best UNIX mail
> client. 

http://pgpenvelope.sourceforge.net

is also quite nice..
I thought it was much easier to set up than pgp4pine,
and has a more powerful interface.

- --
"The Funk, the whole Funk, and nothing but the Funk."
Billy Donahue <mailto:billy@dadadada.net>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: pgpenvelope 2.8.11 - http://pgpenvelope.sourceforge.net/

iD8DBQE5fc5B+2VvpwIZdF0RAtd7AJ9ITqBJS21SoNH5YsEZisyhLtqCFQCdFx0E
ndGLb23LAFtrk5es2YB9NBs=
=D355
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----