A suggested addition to the next edition of GPG Manual - Chapter 1
Felix Karpfen
felkarp@pcug.org.au
Sat, 12 Aug 2000 09:27:55 +1000
I believe that I have finally unscrambled my problems and have GPG
fully operational.
I would have got there sooner and not tried the patience of several
contributors to this mailing list, if Chapter 1 of the Manual had been
more explicit about the significance of the file identifiers .gpg, .asc
and .sig.
By a combination of helpful replies to my queries and trial and error I
believe I have managed to sort it all out. The supplied examples in
Chapter 1 all use the required syntax; however, it is not immediately
obvious that this also appears to be the <demanded/preferred> syntax.
I refer specifically to the identifiers for signed files, for the
`revoke' file and for importing keys. This comment might be premature
and these routines may all work equally well with other file
identifiers (specified by the --output option?). However, if my
Newbie experiences are typical, I can see merit in an additional
paragraph in Chapter 1, that explicitly suggests the file identifiers
that have been found to be the most appropriate.
Felix Karpfen
--
Felix Karpfen
felkarp@pcug.org.au
--
Archive is at http://lists.gnupg.org - Unsubscribe by sending mail
with a subject of "unsubscribe" to gnupg-users-request@gnupg.org