Future of GpgME python bindings on PyPi

[Lucas Hoffmann]

Quoting Ingo Klöcker (2025-03-18 21:27:03)
> I think now that we have finally dropped support for Python 2 the build could
> be modernized. Patches are welcome.

Are you talking about the pyproject.toml file that emerged in the python
ecosystem?  I think it is possible to move some metadata from setup.py
to this file and also specify the minimum requirement for setuptools.
That could free the code of the distutils references.

If that is desired I can try to prepare a patch and send it to the list.

> > could try to get at least the current version
> > of https://git.gnupg.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=gpgmepy.git;a=summary
> > up to Pypi. It seems helpful to show that the bindings still exist.
>
> +1 from me.

Also +1 from me. I am speaking on behalf of alot
(https://github.com/pazz/alot), a mail user agent that uses the gpg
python bindings.  We would greatly profit from an updated PyPI package.

Best Regards,
Lucas
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: signature
URL: <https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-devel/attachments/20250318/113b2de8/attachment-0001.sig>