Possible bug in GPGME Python

[Bernhard Reiter]

Hi meep,

Am Samstag 04 Mai 2024 15:55:40 schrieb meep via Gnupg-devel:
> In the interact(...) function of the Context class on line 1089 in
> core.py it is checked whether a key is actually passed in to the
> function:

> Thus I believe that the intended behavior in Python would be to mirror
> the C code and only check whether the key is None if INTERACT_CARD is
> not set.

thanks for reporting the inconsistency.
I've created https://dev.gnupg.org/T7162 so we can keep track of the request.

(What would be helpful to me personally would be a tiny test application
where the wrong behaviour can easily be seen.)

Regards,
Bernhard


-- 
https://intevation.de/~bernhard   +49 541 33 508 3-3
Intevation GmbH, Osnabrück, DE; Amtsgericht Osnabrück, HRB 18998
Geschäftsführer: Frank Koormann, Bernhard Reiter
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 659 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-devel/attachments/20240617/2f5ada73/attachment.sig>