wks for sign-only keys
Erich Eckner
gnupg at eckner.net
Fri Jan 11 09:47:18 CET 2019
On 11.01.19 09:40, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Jan 2019 11:55, gnupg at eckner.net said:
>
>> it can't with the sign-only key. However, would it be possible to fall
>> back to an unencrypted email for keys which are not suited for
>> encrypting? In the end, the content will still be signed, thus authentic.
>
> The purpose of the Web Key Directory is to provide an encryption key for
> a given mail address. It is entirely useless for a signing key because
> a verifying party can't find the key using the Web Key directory because
> the lookup is by the mail address and not by the fingerprint, which is
> provided as part of the signature.
>
>
> Shalom-Salam,
>
> Werner
>
oh, I haven't thought of that. Thanks for the explanation /
clarification :-)
regards,
Erich
More information about the Gnupg-devel
mailing list