[PINENTRY PATCH] add efl-based frontend

[Mike Blumenkrantz]

Hi,

I've sent a new version of the implementation to the list, but it's caught
in moderation because the patch size is 41kb which exceeds the mailing list
limit of 40kb.

Regards,
Mike

On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 9:42 AM Mike Blumenkrantz <zmike at samsung.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 12:10:52 +0100
> Justus Winter <justus at g10code.com> wrote:
>
> > Mike Blumenkrantz <zmike at samsung.com> writes:
> >
> > > Thanks for your clarification. I've attached a new version of the patch
> > > which I believe addresses all the issues you have cited in both the
> > > contents of the patch and the commit log.
> >
> > Thanks.  In the mean time, I was finally able to build the pinentry.  I
> > have some remarks:
> >
> > 1/ the window is very small, there is no margin around the widgets at
> > all, it looks crowded.
> >
> > 2/ as soon as I enter a character, the text input field is resized
> > (enlarged), and as a consequence so is the dialog window.
> >
> > 3/ the buttons have no logos, yet the text is off-center.
>
> Thanks for checking, I'll look into these items.
>
> >
> > > Since we are being very technical about the commit log, and you
> > > specifically cited the docs, I'd like to point out that nowhere in the
> > > docs/HACKING file
> > > (
> https://git.gnupg.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=gnupg.git;a=blob;f=doc/HACKING#l21
> )
> > > does it say anything about capitalization or punctuation. The prefixing
> > > that you've mentioned, while common in commit messages, is referred to
> > > something that is "usually" present, and it has no example for the
> > > addition of new components. Furthermore, listing files with their
> > > changes is also not in this document, nor is it done in every commit:
> > > the top-most commit that I was working off in the tree is
> > >
> https://git.gnupg.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=pinentry.git;a=commit;h=a383ddeb76463ddcf5aca2fb38847ea3158c42a7
> and does not include it.
> > > Based on this disconnect, it's easy to see why someone like
> > > me who has been working off very direct RFC-style specifications
> > > recently would produce a commit log which "stands out" :)
> > >
> > > I'd be happy to submit a patch for the docs/HACKING file which
> > > addresses these discrepancies to avoid any potential confusion
> > > with future contributors.
> >
> > Documentation patches are very welcome :)
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Justus
>
> I'll follow up on this as well.
>
> Regards,
> Mike
> _______________________________________________
> Gnupg-devel mailing list
> Gnupg-devel at gnupg.org
> http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20170130/49e23b17/attachment-0001.html>