Need to distinguish between g10_log_info and g10_log_error
Oleg V. Zhylin
ovz at yahoo.com
Fri Sep 26 12:20:15 CEST 2008
Actually, --logger-fd did the job for me. I'm ok with status messages and as I understood from the sources logger was the source of messages on stderr. Does any --status-fd output goes to stderr?
WBR Oleg V. Zhylin ovz at yahoo.com
--- On Fri, 9/26/08, Werner Koch <wk at gnupg.org> wrote:
> From: Werner Koch <wk at gnupg.org>
> Subject: Re: Need to distinguish between g10_log_info and g10_log_error
> To: ovz at yahoo.com
> Cc: "Adam Milazzo" <adam at adammil.net>, gnupg-devel at gnupg.org
> Date: Friday, September 26, 2008, 10:50 AM
> Hi,
>
> let me remark that you should always use
>
> --status-fd N
>
> if you want to automate gpg's operation (N == 1 works
> if you also use
> the --output option). This is the only reliable way to get
> a positive
> confirmation of gpg's operations. See the file
> doc/DETAILS for details.
>
>
> Salam-Shalom,
>
> Werner
>
> --
> Linux-Kongress 2008 + Hamburg + October 7-10 +
> www.linux-kongress.org
>
> Die Gedanken sind frei. Auschnahme regelt ein
> Bundeschgesetz.
More information about the Gnupg-devel
mailing list