Need to distinguish between g10_log_info and g10_log_error

Oleg V. Zhylin ovz at yahoo.com
Fri Sep 26 12:20:15 CEST 2008


Actually, --logger-fd did the job for me. I'm ok with status messages and as I understood from the sources logger was the source of messages on stderr. Does any --status-fd output goes to stderr?

WBR Oleg V. Zhylin   ovz at yahoo.com


--- On Fri, 9/26/08, Werner Koch <wk at gnupg.org> wrote:

> From: Werner Koch <wk at gnupg.org>
> Subject: Re: Need to distinguish between g10_log_info and g10_log_error
> To: ovz at yahoo.com
> Cc: "Adam Milazzo" <adam at adammil.net>, gnupg-devel at gnupg.org
> Date: Friday, September 26, 2008, 10:50 AM
> Hi,
> 
> let me remark that you should always use
> 
>  --status-fd N 
> 
> if you want to automate gpg's operation (N == 1 works
> if you also use
> the --output option).  This is the only reliable way to get
> a positive
> confirmation of gpg's operations.  See the file
> doc/DETAILS for details.
> 
> 
> Salam-Shalom,
> 
>    Werner
> 
> -- 
> Linux-Kongress 2008 + Hamburg + October 7-10 +
> www.linux-kongress.org
> 
>    Die Gedanken sind frei.  Auschnahme regelt ein
> Bundeschgesetz.


      



More information about the Gnupg-devel mailing list