[BUG/Gpgme] checking message with a revoked key
Albrecht Dreß
albrecht.dress at arcor.de
Fri May 21 14:00:07 CEST 2004
Am 21.05.04 01:05 schrieb(en) Marcus Brinkmann:
> The invalid engine is caused by a VALIDSIG without starting a
> signature (as REVKEYSIG was not recognized). Can you try the below
> patch if it helps? It's totally untested (didn't even try to compile
> it).
Wow - great patch!! Now op_verify correctly returns with no error, writes
back the "decrypted" contents, and the signature status says "certificate
revoked". Good work!!
> BTW, the CERT_REVOKED error code in the patch is probably bogus. From
> a quick glance, I agree with you that a KEY_REVOKED error code is
> needed in gpg-error.
Now I'm looking eagerly forward to a new gpgme/gpg-error tarball 2B
released soon, so I can feed the fix and the new key status/error upstream
into balsa... ;-))
Thanks,
Albrecht.
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Albrecht Dreß - Johanna-Kirchner-Straße 13 - D-53123 Bonn (Germany)
Phone (+49) 228 6199571 - mailto:albrecht.dress at arcor.de
_________________________________________________________________________
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : /pipermail/attachments/20040521/bc70292d/attachment.bin
More information about the Gnupg-devel
mailing list