GnuPG footprint questions
David Shaw
dshaw at jabberwocky.com
Thu Jan 2 15:42:06 CET 2003
On Wed, Jan 01, 2003 at 06:55:07PM +0530, Ashwin Patwekar wrote:
> Hi ,
>
> What would be the minumum foot print of gnupg ?
> I plan to use it on embedded gnu linux (arm) with only the decrypt
> functionality how small can it get?
> Is there a slim solution of gnupg available ?
The easiest thing to do is to build it with:
./configure --disable-exec --disable-nls --disable-dynload
It's not difficult to go even smaller by stripping out various ciphers
or the help text strings, but there is currently no way to do that
with a simple ./configure option. You'd have to edit the source.
As for removing the encrypt functionality, that's an edit-the-source
as well. I wonder how much space you'd save doing that, since the
encrypt and decrypt functions share a lot of the same underlying code.
David
--
David Shaw | dshaw at jabberwocky.com | WWW http://www.jabberwocky.com/
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
"There are two major products that come out of Berkeley: LSD and UNIX.
We don't believe this to be a coincidence." - Jeremy S. Anderson
More information about the Gnupg-devel
mailing list