GnuPG and trailing whitespace handling
Werner Koch
wk at isil.d.shuttle.de
Wed Feb 10 11:09:13 CET 1999
Russ Allbery <rra at stanford.edu> writes:
> It sounds to me like your implementation is correct according to the RFC,
> and I think it's a considerably saner way of handling things anyway. I
After looking at my code I detected a /*fixme: ... */ which indicates
that there is still a problem which is not easy to solve (does mode
't' always implies sigclass 0x01? We need to know this in case that
there is no one-pass signature packet).
Thanks,
Werner
--
ceterum censeo RSA esse delendam
More information about the Gnupg-devel
mailing list