Version
brian moore
bem at cmc.net
Mon Oct 12 15:32:57 CEST 1998
On Mon, Oct 12, 1998 at 10:49:51PM +0200, Robert Richard George 'reptile' Wal wrote:
> On 98.10.12 brian moore pressed the following keys:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 12, 1998 at 11:52:23AM -0700, Ron Echeverri wrote:
> > > Werner Koch writes:
> > > "John A. Martin" <jam at jamux.com> writes:
> > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > > ASCII armors are depreciated - you should use MIME ;-)
> > >
> > > Forgive the digression, but what would the proper MIME type be? :)
> >
> > Content-Type: application/pgp; format=text; x-action=sign
>
> And what is the RFC that describes this beast?
None that I've seen.
> Reptile
>
> PS. Yes, I am picky, because there is RFC about PGP encapsulated in MIME.
> RFC2015.
Depends on the mail client. The original method (non-multipart) still
works, and is generated (and accepted) by a large number of clients.
Note that not everything is documented with RFCs. (HTTP existed long
before an RFC described it -- it's still a very successful protocol.)
--
Brian Moore | "The Zen nature of a spammer resembles
Sysadmin, C/Perl Hacker | a cockroach, except that the cockroach
Usenet Vandal | is higher up on the evolutionary chain."
Netscum, Bane of Elves. Peter Olson, Delphi Postmaster
More information about the Gnupg-devel
mailing list