[PATCH] MPI helper of comparison, Least Leak Intended

[NIIBE Yutaka]

Sorry, this phrase came from my confusion.  Please ignore this phrase.

NIIBE Yutaka <gniibe at fsij.org> wrote:
> The current use of _gcry_mpih_cmp_ui is only at one place.  That is,
> catching a wrong use case (where no inverse exists) in the function
> mpih_invm_odd (libgcrypt/mpi/mpi-inv.c).  So, one of these changes would
> be possible (in future, if needed).  But in such a case, I'd prefer
> change of the function name (not cmp_ui, which suggests -1, 0, 1) so
> that keeping least surprise.

The topic in this thread is for _gcry_mpih_cmp_lli.
--