[PATCH 3/3] Add support for GOST R 34.10-2001/-2012 signatures
    Werner Koch 
    wk at gnupg.org
       
    Thu Oct  3 17:14:40 CEST 2013
    
    
  
On Thu,  3 Oct 2013 11:43, dbaryshkov at gmail.com said:
> of the domain field. From my understanding it is used only for key generation,
> isn't it? Does it have any other usecases?
There are two purposes for the dialect field:
 - Allow to tweak the computation - for example in the case of EdDSA.
 
 - Allow to divert for optimized maths for a specific curve.
> ecdsa signatures. Thus I added a (flag gost) to data/signature generation.
> IIUC, there is no any significant difference between ECDSA and GOST
> curves/keys.
Even then it might be useful to flag it as a dialect
(e.g. ..DIALECT_SUBGROUP) - might come handy later.
Shalom-Salam,
   Werner
-- 
Die Gedanken sind frei.  Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.
    
    
More information about the Gcrypt-devel
mailing list