[PATCH] Truncate hash values for ECDSA signature scheme
    Werner Koch 
    wk at gnupg.org
       
    Mon Dec 16 20:23:15 CET 2013
    
    
  
On Mon, 16 Dec 2013 19:05, dbaryshkov at gmail.com said:
> Note: we are truncating hash, so there should be no difference in truncating
> LSB or MSB. Both should be equally distributed.
But that would we incompatible.  I have not checked but it might be that
we do the truncation in GnuPG.  Needs to be further researched.
Would you mind to open a ticket for this?
Salam-Shalom,
   Werner
-- 
Die Gedanken sind frei.  Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.
    
    
More information about the Gcrypt-devel
mailing list