Gratuitous gcry_fast_random_poll
Werner Koch
wk at gnupg.org
Fri May 7 11:17:11 CEST 2004
On Wed, 5 May 2004 16:10:09 -0500, Christian Grothoff said:
> All I'm saying is leave that to the application. For example, I may not be
> using any key generation from libgcrypt, so I definitely don't need any of
You may want to create a signature and thus you need random. There
are quite some palces where random numbers are required and so for the
avaerage application the current scheme works.
> the PRNG code. And as others have remarked before, assertion failures are
> bad anyway -- return error codes. If the client doesn't check them, then the
It is not always pissible to return error codes. Some functions are
expected to simply work. If they don;t, something is badly wrong with
their environment.
> originally written for an earlier version of libgcrypt and had not been
> adapted. Anyway, it should work just fine (with any version of libgcrypt) if
> the client guarantees that only one thread enters libgcrypt at a time. Now,
Obviously there is another thread using libgcrypt.
> time for operations that may require global state" -- and the call in
> question requires global state (and sync) on a path where that's completely
> counter-intuitive.
You should not make any assumption about the internal working of a
library. This may work for one version but maybe not for the next.
We have tried to hide all details but your are still looking inside.\
- don't do this.
> Oh, we're using pthreads, I've resolved the problem by putting some extra
> locks around our libgcrypt calls (since I don't want to rely on a 'recent'
> libgcrypt version). Nevertheless I find the random-poll is completely out of
There is only one stable release yet - all prior releases where
clearly marked as under development. Please change gnunet to properly
intialize libgcrypt and you are set.
> random (pun not intended) injection of the call. The code in question
> initializes the symcipher millions of times but never ever creates a single
If you make such heavy use of cipher_open, please change your
application to presever the context returned by cipher_open and use
gcry_cipher_reset before setting up a new key and IV. This will avoid
a lot of other overhead too.
Werner
More information about the Gcrypt-devel
mailing list